Australia's largest independent migration law firm. Open 7 days! Book here.
Need help? Our lawyers and migration agents are available 7 days a week to assist.
There are no hidden costs for our services. Our fees are clearly set out in a fee agreement.
From the first same-day response to the conclusion of your case, you’ll have direct access to a lawyer.
Our experienced lawyers will give you regular updates and clear explanations of your appeal and review pathways.
We offer a satisfaction guarantee in relation to your representation in appeal and review matters.
We will discuss payment options available for your appeal or review.
If the minister receives information in relation to your application that they deem may be part of a reason for refusal, the Department is required to alert you and invite you to comment on the information. This is required by s 57 of the Migration Act. This requirement helps to promote natural justice by giving all applicants an opportunity to comment or explain why the information should not lead to a refusal. This is why the s 57 letter is otherwise known as an ‘Invitation to Comment on [Adverse] Information’ held by the Department.
In order to uphold natural justice, the letter you receive will contain details of the allegations that the Department is making against the information or documents that you have submitted. The allegations may range in severity from a mistake in address, to a severe adverse finding against you. The letter will invite you to respond within a set time period. This post will guide you through what to expect in a letter and outline the possible ways of responding.
Key elements of natural justice include the right to a fair hearing, the right to know the case against you, the right to present evidence, and the right to have decisions made by an unbiased decision-maker. These principles are essential for maintaining the integrity of legal processes and upholding individuals' rights. In the context of administrative or governmental decisions, such as visa applications, natural justice requires that applicants be given notice of adverse information or decisions affecting them and the opportunity to respond before any final decision is made.
As required by the Migration Act, a Natural Justice letter must necessarily provide detailed ‘particulars’ of the relevant information. In doing this, the Department must provide enough information to ensure that you understand why the adverse finding is relevant to their consideration of your application. The letter should draw you attention to exactly what is in question and instruct you as to the matters requiring your response. If you believe that your letter does not contain sufficiently specific information, you may seek the advice of a lawyer.
Impartiality is a fundamental tenet of law, meaning that all applicants have a right for their application to be considered free from bias. The s 57 request must demonstrate impartiality and must only assess your case based on its merits, rather than any external consideration beyond the scope of what is permitted. This means that the decision maker is considering your application afresh, and not applying any personal or political bias. If you believe that bias is involved in the decision making, it is important to contact a lawyer promptly.
The right to a fair hearing is a fundamental part of natural justice. It allows applicants to hear arguments lodged against them and present or challenge evidence. This is a key purpose of natural justice letter. As such, the letter will include an invitation to respond to the allegations.
Any invitation to respond to allegations will likely be capped with a time limit. This is because justice is intended to be carried on in a reasonable timeframe. In most cases, you will have 28 days to respond to the S57 letter. It is important to obey the timeframe specified in your letter as there is often little room have the timeline extended .If you are given an unreasonably short period in which you must reply, it is important to contact a lawyer promptly.
It is highly advantageous to seek legal advice from an immigration lawyer when facing visa cancellation as they are experts in this area. Australian Migration Lawyers, boasting a team of seasoned and highly trained legal professionals.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
There are a few possible options available to you once you receive a S57 letter. It is important to seek advice on the best pathway for your circumstances, in order to promote the chances of a positive outcome. The following steps will help.
It is important to examine the letter carefully and pay attention to the precise information that the department claims to be bogus or incorrect. The Department can use complex wording that is difficult to understand. If the substance of the allegations is not clear to you, please do not hesitate to engage a lawyer to assist.
As required by the Migration Act, a Natural Justice letter must necessarily provide detailed ‘particulars’ of the relevant information. In doing this, the Department must provide enough information to ensure that you understand why the adverse finding is relevant to their consideration of your application. The letter should draw you attention to exactly what is in question and instruct you as to the matters requiring your response. If you believe that your letter does not contain sufficiently specific information, you may seek the advice of a lawyer.
Once you are aware of the allegations to respond to, and have determined your course of action, it is necessary to begin compiling evidence. The evidence submitted may vary depending on what is required in your individual circumstances. Written submission should be carefully prepared and any corroborating evidence appropriately labeled.
Your response must be submitted within the timeframe specified on your letter. Typically, this requires your submission to be uploaded to your Immi account. You may be able to submit your response via postage if your Immi account is not available to you at that time. If there is a cause for delay, it is important to contact a lawyer immediately to assist you.
S56 and S57 requests are similar insofar as they both provide applicants with a chance to be heard and supply additional information to the Department. However, an S57 request is only generated where the Department suspects that one of your documents may be false or bogus or whether any adverse information was provided. Alternatively, an S56 request may be a straightforward request for you to supply further information regarding your application. For example, the request may be for an additional birth certificate or health record.
Whilst an S56 request is less adverse in nature, responding in a timely manner remains important. Whilst it is beneficial to provide all relevant information, avoid submitting unnecessary evidence as this may delay your application further.
We offer professional migration advice and support, no matter where you are based. Those located in Australia have the choice of meeting with us at one of our offices or online, and for those offshore, we are available to you online.
Read our most commonly asked questions about the Section 57 letters
Section 57 of the Migration Act was enacted to require the Minister (or their delegates) to inform an applicant when relevant information they have supplied is thought to be false or bogus or if adverse information was provided. It also requires the Minister to provide the applicant with an opportunity to comment on the information. The requirement for the Minister to notify under this section may be activated where the visa is anticipated to be refused. Together, these requirements of notification and comment form the principle of natural justice which is required to be afforded to everyone in the decision making process. Additionally, the section works in tandem with section 58, which specifies what the invitation to comment must contain.
After submitting a response to your S57 natural justice request, you are required to wait for the Department to process your information. The wait time will vary depending on your visa type, the nature of the submission and the workload of the Department at the time of submission. Unfortunately, this means that the wait time is unpredictable and will vary on a case-by-case basis. However, ensuring that you supply accurate and appropriate information in your response will help to expedite this process. Including unnecessary documents will delay, and possibly complicate the process further. Engaging a lawyer to assist you in drafting your response will ensure that the information provided is exactly what is necessary to respond to the Department’s request.
Absolutely! The purpose of a S57 letter is to ensure that applicants are given an opportunity to defend their application in the event that it is being considered for rejection. Whilst this does mean that the Department has identified a problem with your application, it does not mean that they have reached a final decision. Section 57 of the Migration Act prohibits the Department from reaching a final decision without notifying the applicant and offering them a chance to comment. This means that where a natural justice letter is responded to appropriately, the Department may end up changing their initial opinion and approving the application. This is not unlikely, yet it required a comprehensive and well prepared response. Engaging a lawyer at this point in time is pivotal.
Generally, applicants have 28 days to respond to a natural justice letter. The exact time frame will be set out in the letter. In the event that no time frame is mentioned, a ‘reasonable period’ will apply. There is also a possibility that the Minister may extend the time frame. However, the Minister retains full discretion in exercising this power, therefore the extension should not be relied upon. Complying with time frame requirements is important, and submissions made outside of the time frame are likely to be rejected - increasing the risk of visa refusal.
Tell us a little about your situation, and one of our migration lawyers will get back to you as soon as possible.